<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    
    <title>Arogl Darthu's Blog - Comments</title>
    <link>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/</link>
    <description>Arogl Darthu's Blog - profound astoundment</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <generator>Serendipity 1.5.4 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 10:32:14 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Embarrasssed: BIOS IDE Detection Hell</title>
    <link>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#c10</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Embarrasssed)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I&#039;m glad I found this. I&#039;m embarrassed... I work with this stuff all day... I assumed it was on cable select...didn&#039;t think it mattered if it was master.  I was wrong.  Ha ha ..Newman! 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 05:34:26 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-guid.html#c10</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Twan: BIOS IDE Detection Hell</title>
    <link>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#c9</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Twan)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Nice to hear I&#039;m not the only one experiencing this IDE detection quirk... 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 06:34:31 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-guid.html#c9</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>RichT: BIOS IDE Detection Hell</title>
    <link>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#c8</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (RichT)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    I had exactly the same issue and when I changed from MASTER to Cable Select, the boot was lickity-split and it FINALLY resolved my install issue of the drive not being recognised. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 01:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-guid.html#c8</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Twan: BIOS IDE Detection Hell</title>
    <link>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#c4</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Twan)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Hi Bart,&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
I used two seperate cables with both devices set to master and at the right end of the cables.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
BTW, I didn&#039;t check for any BIOS updates. So that&#039;s still something to look into.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Thanks for the input &lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/templates/default/img/emoticons/smile.png&quot; alt=&quot;:-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Feb 2007 13:15:55 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-guid.html#c4</guid>
    
</item>
<item>
    <title>Bart: BIOS IDE Detection Hell</title>
    <link>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#c3</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-BIOS-IDE-Detection-Hell.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/wfwcomment.php?cid=8</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Bart)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    Oh yeah, I forgot, to bad I can&#039;t edit my last comment by the way.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Try updating the BIOS software to the latest version. It usually won&#039;t hurt and if you&#039;re still testing anyway problems may resolve or surface by doing so. Actually I never had a bad experience with updating a BIOS. But that doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s fool-proof.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Oh, yeah, another thing, I don&#039;t think this was the case but, you didn&#039;t jumper both devices as Master and connected them on the same (ide)cable?&lt;br /&gt;
Anyway, to get the best results in speed from your IDE-devices, try to use a separate IDE-cable to connect them and set them as master. If for example you are unable to do so because of more then 2 devices or to little IDE-controllers on the board, use a setup like this:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;strong&gt; Primary&lt;br /&gt;
** Master - HDD&lt;br /&gt;
** Slave  - HDD/Optical-Reader(use only as last resort)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;/strong&gt; Secondary&lt;br /&gt;
** Master - Optical-Burner/HDD&lt;br /&gt;
** Slave  - Optical-Reader/HDD&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
True, because of Burn-proof and similar   techniques a burner does not need to be set as Master, but because of the speed of today&#039;s burners it&#039;s better to do so anyway.&lt;br /&gt;
Having a second hard-drive set as Secondary Slave it preferred (when using a optical-burner) because the burner is usually not nearly used/accessed as much as the HDD and so speed and access-time is nearly not impacted (though burning from, or accessing, the second HDD will be speed-impacted).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Ok, enough now, maybe I should be starting my own blog on these kind of subjects &lt;img src=&quot;http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/templates/default/img/emoticons/wink.png&quot; alt=&quot;;-)&quot; style=&quot;display: inline; vertical-align: bottom;&quot; class=&quot;emoticon&quot; /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
However, with these extra cents added, it&#039;ll probably be enough to get you going. 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sat, 24 Feb 2007 17:47:21 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.arogldarthu.nl/archives/8-guid.html#c3</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
